Random thoughts on politics, current events, popular culture, and whatever else interests me.
Thursday, July 11, 2002
Wednesday, July 10, 2002
The new hit ad by a group which includes Clintonistas like James Carville compares President George W. Bush to a fox. Machiavelli tells us that isn't a bad thing for a statesman to be. This is especially true when the statesman in question must fight terrorists abroad and liberals at home.
Besides, which animal was Clinton most like? A skunk or a jackal?
Besides, which animal was Clinton most like? A skunk or a jackal?
One of the last men to walk on the Moon says that the Moon will be the source of power for the 21st Century. I can do naught but agree.
Tuesday, July 09, 2002
Reader Harley W. Daugherty offers the following:
God summons George W. Bush, Vladimir Putin and Ariel Sharon to heaven. “I’m sick of all of you,” he tells them, “so I’ve decided to destroy the world.” Bush returns to America and addresses his people. “I’ve got good news and bad news,” he says. “The good news is there is a God. The bad news is he’s going to destroy the world.” Putin tells the Russians, “I’ve got bad news and worse news—there is a God, and he’s going to destroy the world.” Sharon tells the Israelis, “I’ve got good news and better news. There is a God—and there’s never going to be a Palestinian state.”
President Bush did everything but display a guillotine in his speach on corporate crime. Naturally the Democrats are outraged that Dubya didn't propose drawing and quartering.
Louis Farrakhan slanders American Muslims by telling Saddam Hussein that they are all willing to betray their country by supporting Iraq.
By the way, does Calypso Louis know that Iraq, strickly speaking, is not an Islamic government. The ruling Baathist Party has an idealogy which can be best described as a curious mixture of socialism and Pan-Arab nationalism.
By the way, does Calypso Louis know that Iraq, strickly speaking, is not an Islamic government. The ruling Baathist Party has an idealogy which can be best described as a curious mixture of socialism and Pan-Arab nationalism.
Monday, July 08, 2002
Here's some more information on Russia's Mars proposal. Niotice that it uses nuclear-electric propulsion such as NASA is working on.
Carrie Meek is retiring from Congress. Surely the only reason she did so was the realization that the Democrat Party is racist and has no room in it for women of color.
Sunday, July 07, 2002
Saturday, July 06, 2002
The FBI is dithering over what to call the LAX gunman. Is he a terrorist, a hate criminal, a lone nut, or all three?
In the meantime, the Egyptians are wondering what the fuss is all about. After all, they suggest, Americans gun each other down all the time. This from a country which recently spent about ten years suppressing the Islamic Brotherhood's campaign of terror against tourists which consisted of masked Jihadis spraying tour busses with machinegun fire.
In the meantime, the Egyptians are wondering what the fuss is all about. After all, they suggest, Americans gun each other down all the time. This from a country which recently spent about ten years suppressing the Islamic Brotherhood's campaign of terror against tourists which consisted of masked Jihadis spraying tour busses with machinegun fire.
So Russia says it wants to go to Mars.
There are two ways to look at this.
One way is to dismiss it as another scheme by the Russians to create a joint space cash cow with the United States. When one combines "bureaucratic ineffeciencies", "buget problems", and outright graft and corruption, Russian participation in ISS has been a real bonanza for Ivan.
The other way to look at this is to wonder if something behind the scenes might not be going on between the United States and the Russian Republic. Certainly NASA is looking at Mars as a possibility with its new nuclear propulsion/nuclear power initiative. One could imagine a scenario in which, after O'Keefe fixes NASA's fiscal and management problems, Dubya and his good friend Putin have a joint announcement at a summit taking place in-say-the reelection year of 2004.
There are two ways to look at this.
One way is to dismiss it as another scheme by the Russians to create a joint space cash cow with the United States. When one combines "bureaucratic ineffeciencies", "buget problems", and outright graft and corruption, Russian participation in ISS has been a real bonanza for Ivan.
The other way to look at this is to wonder if something behind the scenes might not be going on between the United States and the Russian Republic. Certainly NASA is looking at Mars as a possibility with its new nuclear propulsion/nuclear power initiative. One could imagine a scenario in which, after O'Keefe fixes NASA's fiscal and management problems, Dubya and his good friend Putin have a joint announcement at a summit taking place in-say-the reelection year of 2004.
Friday, July 05, 2002
Iran may be on the verge of revolution. The mullahs are scared enough to hire an army of Iraqi and Palestinian mercenaries to shoot their own people when they take to the streets.
Naturally the appeasers and bootlickers in the US State Department are dithering.
Naturally the appeasers and bootlickers in the US State Department are dithering.
Disinformation? Or the real thing posing as disinformation? In any case, our President is another man not to be messed with.
Prepare to meet thy God, Saddem.
Prepare to meet thy God, Saddem.
Some gentle readers, while appreciating the general thrust of my LA Times piece on the future of space exploration, have expressed surprise that the return to the Moon proposal I made could be accomplished so cheaply. Well, here's some references, courtesy of the Romance to Reality site which summerizes various schemes to go to the Moon and Mars dating back fifty years. The JSC return to the Moon study was done in the mid 1990s. The first Lunar and Planetary Institute proposal occured soon after.
All it will take to go, in my judgement, is the will to go.
All it will take to go, in my judgement, is the will to go.
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
The founding father I should like to celebrate is unknown to history books. Indeed, not much is known about him at all. He moved to South Carolina with his family from Virginia just in time for 1776. His kissed his wife and children goodbye and, taking his rifle down from the mantle, marched forth to join a war which was fought not for land, or booty, or racial or sectarian hatred, but for freedom. He spent the entire war, fighting in South Carolina, then Georgia, then South Carolina again.
The Revolutionary War in the south was a bitter, bloody struggle fought often as not by neighbor and friend against neighbor and friend. Much of the fighting was that of the ambush, the raid, and the massacre in which no quarter was given, nor any recieved. For the man I am writing about, death by shot, shell, or bayonet, suddenly or in screaming, drawn out agony, was the least of his lot. Hunger, cold, weariness must have stalked him for all the years he served.
He fought in some famous battles, of that we are sure, including the Cowpens, when he stood against Tarlington's Legion and helped to break it.
And in the end, with thousands of his bretheran, he won all of our tomorrows of freedom with his sacrifice.
I salute you, Cornelius Whittington, soldier of the revolution, my ancestor.
The Revolutionary War in the south was a bitter, bloody struggle fought often as not by neighbor and friend against neighbor and friend. Much of the fighting was that of the ambush, the raid, and the massacre in which no quarter was given, nor any recieved. For the man I am writing about, death by shot, shell, or bayonet, suddenly or in screaming, drawn out agony, was the least of his lot. Hunger, cold, weariness must have stalked him for all the years he served.
He fought in some famous battles, of that we are sure, including the Cowpens, when he stood against Tarlington's Legion and helped to break it.
And in the end, with thousands of his bretheran, he won all of our tomorrows of freedom with his sacrifice.
I salute you, Cornelius Whittington, soldier of the revolution, my ancestor.
Stanley R. Fencel liked my LA Times piece:
Saw your article, "Lets aim for the Moon, or Mars in the LA Times today and I heartily concurr. My subject quote is from an article by Space Cycle corp in which the author said the first astronauts steps on Mars would be on their "hands and knees". I have a quote from Daniel Goldin on the terrible health problems in space travel. Your thesis would also alleviate the NIH SYNDROME, (not invented here) which stonewalls Astronaut health and performance solutions on prolonged space missions outside Nasa. I have an extensive background in design of exercise apparatuses, and I am the first and only person to jog underwater, totally submerged, without weights, to simulate mobile Earth activities in a space ship
Here's an appreciation of Children of Apollo by M. Ramon.
Many thanks for the kind words.
Just finished Children of Apollo, and it was great. As someone who was a real space buff, before his interest in politics and history, it was right up my alley. Imagine, Bill Clinton, driven out of politics, a generation early. Bush, the Houston Congressman as VP for the Space Council, A just Korea type solution for Vietnam, and of course an expansion of the Apollo project. Complaints; how you apparently had a joint space race taking the heart of the peace movement; which would logically prevent the Weather terror that inspired the Huston plan and the Plumbers, which triggered WaterGATE, which led almost inexorably to the Arab boycott, and the demolition of our intelligence services. Only a few commentators among them Mr. Riebling have even really examined the connections involved, and he doesn't write fiction
Many thanks for the kind words.
Tuesday, July 02, 2002
Rand Simberg reminds us that there are two signifigent anniversaries coming this month. The other one falls on July 20th.
More on that from your gentle Curmudgeon anon.
More on that from your gentle Curmudgeon anon.
Monday, July 01, 2002
The next flight of Shenzhou, the prototype of the Chinese manned spacecraft, may launch this September.
Bill Simon is up nine points over Gray Davis in the race for Governor of California. This must not be, suggest the journalistic establishment of California. Because Simon openly consorts with people who oppose abortion.
Russ Lewis finds the issue ad ban in McCain-Feingold as pernicious as attempts by white segregationists to shut up their critics by suing them for libeling in newspaper ads in the early 60s.
Tom Cruise, an actor and a member of the Scientology cult, has decided to thank all of those Americans who made possible a brillient film career.
President Bush is starting a full throated campaign in support of school vouchers now that the courts have proven them constitutional. A lot of people criticized him for dropping vouchers like a live hand grenade in last year's education bill. Now it seems that Dubya just was using shrewd judgement over when and how to pick fights. Last year, vouchers would certainly have failed no matter what. Now there is momentum.
Sunday, June 30, 2002
Bruce Wilson of the Daily Telegraph obviously never learned the maxim: Better to keep one's mouth shut and have people think you're a fool, rather than open it and remove all doubt.
I just finished a book which should be required reading for everyone who is interested in the politics of space exploration. It's entitled Selling Outerspace: Kennedy, The Media, and Funding for Project Apollo, 1961-63 by James Lee Kauffman. The book descibes the initial political and public relations battles which attended the beginning of Project Apollo, which eventually landed a series of expeditions on the lunar surface.
The book is not without its faults. Kauffman seems to accept at face value the arguements of certain labortory scientists and social liberals that human space flight is unnecessary, too expensive, and achieves goals which could be done just as well with robotic missions. He does not cite too much evidence to support this conclusion, and this is a glaring drawback of the book's examination of the scientific, economic, educational, and even military justifications for human space flight in general and the Apollo program in particular. In fact these arguements were very potent, but like all arguements which appeal to reason and a rational understanding of objective reality, often fell short.
"Selling Outer Space" is best when it examins the emotional, romantic argeument for human space exploration. That arguement was that by sending humans to explore space, the United States was recreating in the heavens the epic, pioneering narrative which was the very birth and growth of the country. Shephard, Glenn, and later Armstrong, Conrad, and Young were later day versions of Columbus, Magellean, Lewis, and Clark. That metaphor had great power in the early 1960s and Kauffman, I think, is quite correct that it "sealed the deal" as it were over whether the United States would embark on missions to the Moon.
The political and public relations struggle which Kauffman describes has some relevence for today's situation. While it is true that there is unlikely to be any more neck or nothing, cost is no object Apollo projects (though there are situations conceivable which might change that situation; say, the detection of a large rock headed on collision course for the Earth), even smaller efforts, using "better, faster, cheaper" management techniques, which support commercial development and are in turn supported by the same, are likely to be mired in the same arguements which rang through the halls of Congress and in the media in the early 1960s.
The question which arises, after citing the scientific, economic, educational, and even military justifications for-just to give an example-a human mission to Mars, will the frontier narrative work as it did in 1961? There is some arguement about that. When Dr. Bob Zubrin, the famous advocate of the settlement of Mars, suggested that such an effort was the "manifest destiny" of the human race, he was viciously attacked by even some fellow Mars advocates who brought up the fate of the American Indians in the settlement of Europeans of the Americas. The fact that there all no native Martians to oppress (except perhaps for bacteria) did not enter into the discussion. The revulsion that the phrase "manifest destiny", with its call to explore, settle, and tame a wilderness had very little to do with objective reality, but rather with a new age, radical left reading of history. The "myth" of the American frontier has been replaced, in the minds of certain people, with the myth of the rape of the American frontier.
So what to do? Do we avoid a fight with the politically correct by trying to find another narrative to use as a metaphor. I had suggested, at one time, the phrase the American Oddysey, seeing as few people accuse Oddyseus of raping the land and oppressing the natives.
However, I think that a call for some renewed space effort, whether back to the Moon, to Earth approaching asteroids, or even Mars, could serve a useful purpose for a parallel effort to try to win back our history from those politically correct scolds who think that the settlement of the Americas and the founding of the United States was just one, long drawn out atrocity inflicted by evil, murderous, greedy white men against peaceful, inoffensive, and indeed passive "Native Americans." After 9/11 there seems to be far less tolerance for the PC way of looking at the world and at history. A debate over the history of pioneering exploration, in which those people are defeated, will serve to facilitate the expansion of the human species to the planets and ultimately to the stars.
The book is not without its faults. Kauffman seems to accept at face value the arguements of certain labortory scientists and social liberals that human space flight is unnecessary, too expensive, and achieves goals which could be done just as well with robotic missions. He does not cite too much evidence to support this conclusion, and this is a glaring drawback of the book's examination of the scientific, economic, educational, and even military justifications for human space flight in general and the Apollo program in particular. In fact these arguements were very potent, but like all arguements which appeal to reason and a rational understanding of objective reality, often fell short.
"Selling Outer Space" is best when it examins the emotional, romantic argeument for human space exploration. That arguement was that by sending humans to explore space, the United States was recreating in the heavens the epic, pioneering narrative which was the very birth and growth of the country. Shephard, Glenn, and later Armstrong, Conrad, and Young were later day versions of Columbus, Magellean, Lewis, and Clark. That metaphor had great power in the early 1960s and Kauffman, I think, is quite correct that it "sealed the deal" as it were over whether the United States would embark on missions to the Moon.
The political and public relations struggle which Kauffman describes has some relevence for today's situation. While it is true that there is unlikely to be any more neck or nothing, cost is no object Apollo projects (though there are situations conceivable which might change that situation; say, the detection of a large rock headed on collision course for the Earth), even smaller efforts, using "better, faster, cheaper" management techniques, which support commercial development and are in turn supported by the same, are likely to be mired in the same arguements which rang through the halls of Congress and in the media in the early 1960s.
The question which arises, after citing the scientific, economic, educational, and even military justifications for-just to give an example-a human mission to Mars, will the frontier narrative work as it did in 1961? There is some arguement about that. When Dr. Bob Zubrin, the famous advocate of the settlement of Mars, suggested that such an effort was the "manifest destiny" of the human race, he was viciously attacked by even some fellow Mars advocates who brought up the fate of the American Indians in the settlement of Europeans of the Americas. The fact that there all no native Martians to oppress (except perhaps for bacteria) did not enter into the discussion. The revulsion that the phrase "manifest destiny", with its call to explore, settle, and tame a wilderness had very little to do with objective reality, but rather with a new age, radical left reading of history. The "myth" of the American frontier has been replaced, in the minds of certain people, with the myth of the rape of the American frontier.
So what to do? Do we avoid a fight with the politically correct by trying to find another narrative to use as a metaphor. I had suggested, at one time, the phrase the American Oddysey, seeing as few people accuse Oddyseus of raping the land and oppressing the natives.
However, I think that a call for some renewed space effort, whether back to the Moon, to Earth approaching asteroids, or even Mars, could serve a useful purpose for a parallel effort to try to win back our history from those politically correct scolds who think that the settlement of the Americas and the founding of the United States was just one, long drawn out atrocity inflicted by evil, murderous, greedy white men against peaceful, inoffensive, and indeed passive "Native Americans." After 9/11 there seems to be far less tolerance for the PC way of looking at the world and at history. A debate over the history of pioneering exploration, in which those people are defeated, will serve to facilitate the expansion of the human species to the planets and ultimately to the stars.
Al Gore has decided that it's more becoming to wage class warfare against the rich and powerful from the comfort of a 2.3 million dollar palace located in the toniest neighborhood in Nashville. He's also blasting President Bush's handling the War on Terror, suggesting that he would have done better. Right. That's sort of like Neville Chambelain criticizing Churchill for not being tough enough on Hitler.
Friday, June 28, 2002
In order to avoid offensing disabled people, the musical play version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame is being changed to The Bellringer of Notredame. No, I'm not kidding.
Mars needs liberals. Now it is entertaining to find someone on the left who actually approves of space settlements. And the idea of trying out liberal ideas at a Martian settlement is interesting, to say the least. Will political correctness mix with the pioneer spirit? That's an experiment I'd love to see tried.
More news on the shuttle problems. Reading between the lines, it looks like NASA is looking at repair options and will try to avoid replacing the linings entirely if at all possible.
Thursday, June 27, 2002
There's an unconfirmed story that should the cracked linings in the fuel lines of the space shuttle orbiters have to be replaced, much of the shuttle fleet may be grounded for two to three years. That's because the tooling to make the linings no longer exist and will have to be recreated..
More on this as more concrete information is known.
More on this as more concrete information is known.
The Supreme Court's approval of vouchers is as history making in its own way as Brown vrs Board of Education. At long last, poor students will be able to opt out of failing public schools and go to private schools (even religious ones) instead. This will not, as opponents fear, mean the death of the public school system. This will force public schools to reform themselves.
Rand Simberg points out that the recent grounding of the space shuttle fleet is a reminder of the folly of relying on a single, government run vehicle for all of our human space flight needs. Despite the fact that it was a good idea at the time, the space shuttle program was set up to fail from the beginning. Why? you ask. Well, for two reasons. One, not enough resources were spent in the development phase to make the vehicle totally resuable. Two, it was an all things for all people vehicle built and run by the government.
Imagine if we had approached air travel that way? The thought just sends shivers up the spine.
Imagine if we had approached air travel that way? The thought just sends shivers up the spine.
James Higgens tells us that the Martha Stewert/ImClone scandal is the result of Corporate-Clintonism.
Indeed. Back when Slick Willy was getting away with lying and cheating, some of us were sadly pointing out what a bad example the former POTUS was making. Now from seventh graders having oral sex-and claiming that it isn't really sex-to corporate sharks shading their books, we have reaped what we have sown. Once again there are fortunately adults now in Washington to clean up the mess.
Indeed. Back when Slick Willy was getting away with lying and cheating, some of us were sadly pointing out what a bad example the former POTUS was making. Now from seventh graders having oral sex-and claiming that it isn't really sex-to corporate sharks shading their books, we have reaped what we have sown. Once again there are fortunately adults now in Washington to clean up the mess.
Ann Coulter rolled out her new book Slander: Liberal Lies about the American Right yesterday on just about every TV show I saw. As a constant victim of liberal smears, I find the book long overdue.
Unfortunately, I wasn't very impressed by Ann's various appearences. On one program, when challenged by the host for specific examples for some of her assertions, Ms. Coulter was unprepared. On another program, she complained constantly about being paired with a liberal guest and with questions about current events (the Pledge of Allegance ruling.)
Now I know that producers are not at this time beating down the door to get me to hawk Children of Apollo, but I think that even I could have done a better job. For instance, if asked to back up my assertion that liberals by and large tend to oppose space exploration, I would have a couple of quotes available. My favorite is one by Walter Mondale from 1970 in which he manages to mention every liberal enthusiasm (education, environment, housing, and so on) to express his opposition to the idea of a space station.
And if someone paired me with-say-Robert Park, I would relish the opportunity. ("Tell a real field scientist-say a geologist-that he should just stay home and watch rock formations on TV and he would laugh at you." or perhaps "What in heaven's name is wrong with outerspace bungee jumping? Sounds like fun to me.)
And if asked about-say-the current grounding of the space shuttle fleet, I respond, "As I suggest in my book, Children of Apollo---" and go from there.)
The trick, I'm told, is to get your face on TV, keep mentioning the name of your book, and try not to look like a fool. One would have thought Ann Coulter would have known this by now.
Unfortunately, I wasn't very impressed by Ann's various appearences. On one program, when challenged by the host for specific examples for some of her assertions, Ms. Coulter was unprepared. On another program, she complained constantly about being paired with a liberal guest and with questions about current events (the Pledge of Allegance ruling.)
Now I know that producers are not at this time beating down the door to get me to hawk Children of Apollo, but I think that even I could have done a better job. For instance, if asked to back up my assertion that liberals by and large tend to oppose space exploration, I would have a couple of quotes available. My favorite is one by Walter Mondale from 1970 in which he manages to mention every liberal enthusiasm (education, environment, housing, and so on) to express his opposition to the idea of a space station.
And if someone paired me with-say-Robert Park, I would relish the opportunity. ("Tell a real field scientist-say a geologist-that he should just stay home and watch rock formations on TV and he would laugh at you." or perhaps "What in heaven's name is wrong with outerspace bungee jumping? Sounds like fun to me.)
And if asked about-say-the current grounding of the space shuttle fleet, I respond, "As I suggest in my book, Children of Apollo---" and go from there.)
The trick, I'm told, is to get your face on TV, keep mentioning the name of your book, and try not to look like a fool. One would have thought Ann Coulter would have known this by now.
Now environmentalists are mad at Gray Davis. Why? you ask. Well, they claim that he's been bought off by the polluting industries.
Wednesday, June 26, 2002
The Senate voted to restore funding for missile defense which Carl Levin wanted to cut. It just goes to show that a kind word and a veto threat goes farther than just a kind word.
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has just ruled the Pledge of Allegance unconstitutional. Yes, that's right, it did. They did so because it mentions "one nation under God."
This idiocy is one reason why the Republicans should recapture the Senate this year. Democrats have been holding up President Bush's conservative judicial nominees, who would presumably not rule in such a way, in an effort to keep the court system as liberal and as politically correct as possible.
This idiocy is one reason why the Republicans should recapture the Senate this year. Democrats have been holding up President Bush's conservative judicial nominees, who would presumably not rule in such a way, in an effort to keep the court system as liberal and as politically correct as possible.
Senator Max Baucus (D) Montana seems to be schoozing more with the Hollywood Left than with his own constituants. This may cost him.
Members of Congress of both parties are not amused by the investigation of the 4-H Club. The Ag Department should drio this silliness.
Monday, June 24, 2002
Bush's Agriculture Department is getting ready to embaress itself with a descent into political correctness. It is about to investigate the 4-H Club for civil rights violations. The crime? Using American Indian names and symbols.
Arnold Beichman wants to nominate President Bush for a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping a nuclear war between India and Pakistan. That would be wonderful, if only to see the look on Bill Clinton's face if Dubya were to win. Clinton actively campaigned for a Peace Prize, thinking he deserved one for his failed efforts in the Middle East.
White people in Zimbabwe are now forbidden to farm. But doing this, Zimbabwe may have consigned many of its citizens to slow death by starvation.
Gray Davis's main political advisor makes James Carville seem-well-sane. His behavior may help his boss into premature retirement this November.
Amtrak may soon consist of a single line linking Boston, New York, and Washington DC. And about time too.
Looks like Hollywood has gotten over its phobia about Muslim fanatics as bad people. I wonder if James Zogby has seen this?
The link, by the way, contains a few spoliers about next season's 24, one of my favorite TV shows.
The link, by the way, contains a few spoliers about next season's 24, one of my favorite TV shows.
President Bush's Middle East speach was not as horrible as I had feared. Indeed it seemed to be a dose of tough love for the Palestinians, giving them their marching orders which they must obey if they are to get their state. But can the Palestinians ween themselves from what Professor Glenn Reynolds has aptly called the "psychotic cult of death?" I tend to doubt it.
Is there no end to the damage caused to the environment by environmentalists? The latest example are the wild fires in Colorado and now Arizona caused primarily by the opposition by environmentalists to thinning forests.
Rand Simberg informs me the following of Mr. Carmack:
All I can say is, wow.
Oh, and good luck John on your space enterprise.
Is a writer of videogames, including Doom.
He's also the founder and president of Armadillo Aerospace, which he's
funding with his gaming fortune. He plans to have a passenger-carrying
suborbital vehicle in a couple years.
All I can say is, wow.
Oh, and good luck John on your space enterprise.
Sunday, June 23, 2002
A reader named John Carmack was kind enough to drop me the following note about Chidren of Apollo:
Wow, maybe Children of Apollo really is a pretty good story if I'm actually getting fan mail.
Nocturne, by the way, is a thriller I wrote with the lovely and talented Ms. Chantal Whittington a few years ago. It can best be described as Nick and Nora Charles meet the Manchurian Candidate in Venice toward the end of the Cold War. I'm probably biased, but I think its a pretty good read as well.
I just wanted to say I enjoyed the book. It pushed a couple other books I had already started down my reading stack for a while, so it was pretty compelling. I'll give Nocturne a try now.
Wow, maybe Children of Apollo really is a pretty good story if I'm actually getting fan mail.
Nocturne, by the way, is a thriller I wrote with the lovely and talented Ms. Chantal Whittington a few years ago. It can best be described as Nick and Nora Charles meet the Manchurian Candidate in Venice toward the end of the Cold War. I'm probably biased, but I think its a pretty good read as well.
Looks like NASA is actually serious about cutting space station costs. This move is going to make some people, who believe that the purpose of a space project is to employ the most people possible, angry.
Saturday, June 22, 2002
King Henry VIII of England may have delayed the Industrial Revolution by two hundred years when he seized the monasteries. It seems that some monks in Yorkshire had a working blast furnace.
Now PBS had banned a song by Charlie Daniels paying tribute to the victims of 9/11 from a 4th of July special.
Thursday, June 20, 2002
Is there no end to the capacity of Chris Mathews to embaress himself over his squishiness on the subject of Iraq? Apparently not, for on Thursday's Hardball he offered the following scenario to Peter Arnett. A group of Iraqi women, wearing tight clothes, shorts, and makeup in the Western style confront a group of American occupation troops in Bahgdad in the near future and explain to these American boys how much they hate them for overthrowing Saddem. Even Peter Arnett, who in his time has been a shill for both the Viet Cong and Saddem, found this a little too much. He suggested that the American boys and Iraqi girls would quickly pair off and go off somewhere to do what boys and girls do naturally.
Children of Apollo is now available at Books A Million and Barnes and Noble at thirty percent off the cover price.
Wednesday, June 19, 2002
Here's a State Department circular which warns American women of the pitfalls of marrying Saudi men. The State Department also washes it's hands of the plight of American children kept hostage in the Kingdom by their Saudi fathers with a breath taking directness worthy of Pontius Pilate.
Naturally the State Department took the warning down when a Muslim pressure group complained. They are, to put it politely, gutless cowards and appeasers.
Naturally the State Department took the warning down when a Muslim pressure group complained. They are, to put it politely, gutless cowards and appeasers.
Looks like back to back suicide/murder bombings has caused the President to rethink his proposal for a "provisional state" for the Palestinians.
According to the Washington Times, Peter Jennings-a native of Canada-has banned American country singer Toby Keith from the opening slot on ABC's 4th of July Celebration for the crime of politically incorrect singing:
"Country star Toby Keith has never toed the politically correct line, but now it's cost him the opening slot on ABC's all-star Fourth of July celebration," reports Liza Zhito of the Texas Review Society.
"Keith was invited to perform his new song, 'Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue (The Angry American)' at the upcoming telecast. But ABC's Peter Jennings pulled the plug, citing the song's lyrics, which he felt 'did not belong on his network,' Mr. Keith said."
Mr. Keith's song is an "angry tongue-lashing" of those behind the September 11 attacks, Miss Zhito says. The lyrics include a graphic offer to inflict painful damage on supporters of terrorism with a "boot that says 'Made in the USA.'"
As for ABC's Mr. Jennings, a native of Toronto, Mr. Keith is not impressed: "I don't care. He's Canadian, ain't he? It's our Fourth of July, not his."
Tuesday, June 18, 2002
Ted Turner called the Israelis terrorists just a few hours before a Palestinian terrorist blew himself and twenty or so Israelis up.
And meanwhile the Bush Administration seems hell bent on calling for a "provisional" Palestinian State, though perhaps with enough strings attached (i.e. the Palestinians must stop murdering people) that the proposal will never fly.
And meanwhile the Bush Administration seems hell bent on calling for a "provisional" Palestinian State, though perhaps with enough strings attached (i.e. the Palestinians must stop murdering people) that the proposal will never fly.
Monday, June 17, 2002
Robert Novak reports that Sharon had some straight talk for some United States Senators. Biden, Kerry, Chafee and Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska seemed to still be in denial, though.
So interestingly enough seems to be Arabphile Robert Novak.
So interestingly enough seems to be Arabphile Robert Novak.
His own people have figured out that Governor Gray Davis is the most hated man in California. Not a nice thing to be when one is running for reelection.
Jed Babbin has an excellent idea of how to rescue some of the American children being held hostage in Saudi Arabia.
House Majority Leader Dick Armey is having fun, according to the Washington Times, with those who said that Welfare Reform would be a disaster for the poor. The real record?
•There are 4.2 million fewer people living in poverty today.
•The poverty rate of single mothers is at its lowest point in U.S. history.
•Employment of single mothers has nearly doubled and employment of mothers without a high school diploma has increased by 60 percent.
•The share of children living in single-mother families has fallen, with no correlated increase in abuse against women and children.
•There are 4.2 million fewer people living in poverty today.
•The poverty rate of single mothers is at its lowest point in U.S. history.
•Employment of single mothers has nearly doubled and employment of mothers without a high school diploma has increased by 60 percent.
•The share of children living in single-mother families has fallen, with no correlated increase in abuse against women and children.
Sunday, June 16, 2002
Looks like the covert phase of the liberation of Iraq is in full swing. And everybody in the country seems to be cool with that, except of course for Chris Mathews and Joe Biden.
Next stop should be, in my opinion, Saudi Arabia. The reasons are stated below.
Next stop should be, in my opinion, Saudi Arabia. The reasons are stated below.
Saturday, June 15, 2002
The White House, increadibly, seems to be about to reward Palestinian terrorism with something called "provisional statehood". If that weren't horrible enough, Ari Fleischer has given the back of his hand to Pat Roush and dozens of other American women whose daughters have been kidnapped by their Saudi fathers and are being held in Saudi Arabia under barbaric conditions, in violation of American law and every standard of human decency. This kind of appeasement of Saudi barbarism and arrogance is not only bad policy, as it sends a signal that they can walk over the United States any time they want, but horrible politics as the mothers and grandmothers of these girls are not going to give up and Congress, which is showing more honor than the White House and especially the State Department in this matter, will take action if no one else does.
These, of course, are the same "allies" who fund terrorists and stoke the hatred of America and Israel on state sponsered media. It's an amazing situation. If a group of American girls were being held by Al Qaeda terrorists, the President would use all the might and majesty of the United States to get them back. But in a situation which is morally no different, our government seems to wish that the issue would go away. This is intolerable, indefensiable, and unteniable.
The President should immediately send the following message to the Saudi potentates. They must behave by the civilized norms of humanity, release these girls, American citizens all, and stop funding and formenting terrorism, or else diplomatic and economic sanctions will be imposed. If he doesn't, Congress is going to do it for him sooner or later.
And of course, We the People can have our say. If we abhore the kidnapping and mistreatment of American girls, we can contact President George W. Bush, and Vice President Dick Cheney, or contact the White House by more conventional means:
And as for the State Department, the focus of dishonor on this issue:
And, of course, the Saudi Embassy in Washington.
These, of course, are the same "allies" who fund terrorists and stoke the hatred of America and Israel on state sponsered media. It's an amazing situation. If a group of American girls were being held by Al Qaeda terrorists, the President would use all the might and majesty of the United States to get them back. But in a situation which is morally no different, our government seems to wish that the issue would go away. This is intolerable, indefensiable, and unteniable.
The President should immediately send the following message to the Saudi potentates. They must behave by the civilized norms of humanity, release these girls, American citizens all, and stop funding and formenting terrorism, or else diplomatic and economic sanctions will be imposed. If he doesn't, Congress is going to do it for him sooner or later.
And of course, We the People can have our say. If we abhore the kidnapping and mistreatment of American girls, we can contact President George W. Bush, and Vice President Dick Cheney, or contact the White House by more conventional means:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
COMMENTS: 202-456-1111
SWITCHBOARD: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461
And as for the State Department, the focus of dishonor on this issue:
Main switchboard number:
(202) 647-4000
Main address:
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
And, of course, the Saudi Embassy in Washington.
Friday, June 14, 2002
Three men are sitting on a bench across the street from the Alamo. One's a
Texan wearing a Stetson hat. One's a Muslim wearing a turban, and the third
an Apache Indian with an eagle feather woven in his hair.
The Indian is rather glum and says, "Once my people were many, but now we are
few."
The Muslim puffs up and says, "Once were few, but now we are many millions."
The Texan adjusts his hat, finishes rolling a smoke, leans back on the bench
and drawls, "That's cause we ain't played cowboys and Muslims yet."
Texan wearing a Stetson hat. One's a Muslim wearing a turban, and the third
an Apache Indian with an eagle feather woven in his hair.
The Indian is rather glum and says, "Once my people were many, but now we are
few."
The Muslim puffs up and says, "Once were few, but now we are many millions."
The Texan adjusts his hat, finishes rolling a smoke, leans back on the bench
and drawls, "That's cause we ain't played cowboys and Muslims yet."
I just finished reading a wonderful alternate history novel.
It's entitled Hannibals Children by John Maddox Roberts.
The premise is that Hannibal defeated the Romans in the Second Punic War. Instead of destroying Rome, he allows the Romans to go into exile in the far north. The Romans found a second empire along the banks of the Danube and conquer the Germans and the Gauls. The story picks up a century later, with the Romans ready now to march south and take back Italy and pay the Carthegenians back for their humiliation.
Naturally it's the first in a series.
It's entitled Hannibals Children by John Maddox Roberts.
The premise is that Hannibal defeated the Romans in the Second Punic War. Instead of destroying Rome, he allows the Romans to go into exile in the far north. The Romans found a second empire along the banks of the Danube and conquer the Germans and the Gauls. The story picks up a century later, with the Romans ready now to march south and take back Italy and pay the Carthegenians back for their humiliation.
Naturally it's the first in a series.
Under the new management of Sean O'Keefe, NASA seems to be on track to actually getting a handle on the costs of the space station.
After that, the task is to find ways to take ISS beyond core complete. My suggestion is to take the space station private and work that problem out commercially.
After that, the task is to find ways to take ISS beyond core complete. My suggestion is to take the space station private and work that problem out commercially.
Hot on the heels of the proposed remake of Three Hundred Spartans, now comes a remark of El Cid, the early sixties epic staring Charleton Heston about the 11th Century hero who united Christians and Muslims in Spain against an invading army of Islamic fanatics. What an interesting message for our age that film would make.
Thursday, June 13, 2002
Richard Starr thinks that the Democrats are like bad poker players, unable to play effectively with a losing hand. George W. Bush has all of the aces, apparently.
Now does that make Dubya the Bret Maverick of American politics? Well, he does have a slight resemblence to Mel Gibson (James Garner is too old and can't play conservative charectors anyway.)
Now does that make Dubya the Bret Maverick of American politics? Well, he does have a slight resemblence to Mel Gibson (James Garner is too old and can't play conservative charectors anyway.)
The Bush Administration has relaxed EPA rules in order to allow utilities to modernize some old power plants which were exempt from clean air rules under a grandfather clause of the Clean Air Act. The rules being relaxed would have required utilities to put in expensive antipollution devices, which meant that utilities were just declining to modernize. Now utilities will be able to make their plants more effecient, which will decrease pollution and lower utility bills.
Naturally the Denocrats and environmental extremists are going berserk, actually accusing the administration of wanted to kill people.
Naturally the Denocrats and environmental extremists are going berserk, actually accusing the administration of wanted to kill people.
Some of my gentle readers have complained that they often can't find Children of Apollo in the stores and that very often the point and click stores (such as Amazon) have the book on back order. Chalk that one down to my small press publisher's not being able to keep up with the unexpected demand. I've been assured that steps are being taken to correct that situation.
The quickest and cheapest way to get a copy, in the meantime, is to order directly from the publisher. Also, check at the space website or the alternate history website which are listed to the left. I have bookmarked all the online stores I know of which carry the book.
The quickest and cheapest way to get a copy, in the meantime, is to order directly from the publisher. Also, check at the space website or the alternate history website which are listed to the left. I have bookmarked all the online stores I know of which carry the book.
Someone's doing a remake of the classic early 60s epic Three Hundred Spartans which stared Richard Egan as King Leonidas who led the Spartans at the Battle of Thermoplyae. That makes two Themoplyae projects, including Gates of Fire from the Steven Pressfield novel.
The idea that there is a link between clerical celibacy and child molestation is, to say the least, controversial. Is there something about clerical celibacy which turns people into pederasts? Or does clerical celibacy attract men who have a prodisposition toward little boys? Or, as many of my conservative friends suggest, are both suppositions bunk?
One thing about having married clerics (an arrangement which seems to have worked well in Protestant dominations for five hundred years and in Judaism for thousands of years), one would know who enjoys sex with adults and therefore are not likely to prey on the altar boys. Not a perfect correlation, of course, but a good, general rule of thumb nevertheless.
One thing about having married clerics (an arrangement which seems to have worked well in Protestant dominations for five hundred years and in Judaism for thousands of years), one would know who enjoys sex with adults and therefore are not likely to prey on the altar boys. Not a perfect correlation, of course, but a good, general rule of thumb nevertheless.
The ABM Treaty is dead. At last it is legal for the United States to defend itself against missiles.
Wednesday, June 12, 2002
Now that Afghan women have been liberated from Islamic fanaticism by the might of American power, it's time for another group of women to be liberated. These are American women and girls held in Saudi Arabia by their Saudi fathers, in violation of American law and every decent idea of human rights. They are being aided and abetted by our own State Department.
Professor Reynolds muses on how future space settlers will govern themselves. It's a situation which I think Captain William Whittington of Virginia (circi 17th Century) and Lt. Cornelius Whittington of the Continental Army (1776-1783) would be well familier with. And more importantly they would approve.
Tuesday, June 11, 2002
In a desperate move to keep American defenseless, a bunch of House Democrats (along with out and out socialist Bernie Sanders) has sued in federal court to stop the country from withdrawing from the ABM Treaty.
Speaking of people who belong in an asylum, it looks like Atlantic City Democrat politics is cut throat. Literally.
It's not surprising (see below) that a majority of Palestinians favor the anniliation of Israel. But that brings to mind a question: Upon what basis do these people deserve a state?
Of course, the West Bank is too big to constitute an asylum.
Of course, the West Bank is too big to constitute an asylum.
Monday, June 10, 2002
The Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace has a report on what is contained in text books used to teach Palestinian children about Jews, Israel, and the history of the Middle East. The EU, the UN, and even the United States are paying for this swill which, in my opinion, even Goebels couldn't have dreamed up.
Leonard David has a piece about asteroid strikes. He suggests that even a "small" strike (i.e. one which does not destroy the world) could be mistaken for a nuclear strike, which could have horrible consequences. This problem was the subject of an old science fiction story, entitled Triggerman if I'm not mistaken.
Incidentally, I published a piece in Space Policy Digest some years ago on the problem of asteroid detection. How to Stop the Sky from Falling suggested that amature astronomies be given an incentive for searching for Earth approaching asteroids. Such people would be given ownership of every asteroid they discover. This would constitute potential wealth in the trillions of dollars, for instance, for a nickel-iron rock.
Naturally I also proposed an excemption from liability should someone's asteroid hit the Earth and leaves lawyers alive.
Incidentally, I published a piece in Space Policy Digest some years ago on the problem of asteroid detection. How to Stop the Sky from Falling suggested that amature astronomies be given an incentive for searching for Earth approaching asteroids. Such people would be given ownership of every asteroid they discover. This would constitute potential wealth in the trillions of dollars, for instance, for a nickel-iron rock.
Naturally I also proposed an excemption from liability should someone's asteroid hit the Earth and leaves lawyers alive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)